MarketEuropean UnionToxicological Study Quality Assessment (EFSA OpenFoodTox)
Audit toxicological study quality and Weight of Evidence for ingredient safety dossiers according to official EFSA and SCHEER criteria.
Not published yet. This capability is on the roadmap and nobody has claimed it yet. What you see below is a proposal, not something you can use today. Claim it as a publisher.
Which market this reads
What this check reads: European Union. No other market is covered.
Reads EU SCHEER 2026 Memorandum, EFSA OpenFoodTox 3.0, and EFSA QSAR rules. US FDA and UK FSA registers are not read.
What it does
Evaluates study quality, SCHEER 2026 WoE, QSAR acceptance, and Qualichem confidence levels against EFSA OpenFoodTox 3.0.
Ask it like this
youEvaluate Weight of Evidence for Bisphenol A with 4 studies (3 high quality, 3 consistent) and test QSAR acceptance for Carbendazim with TEST score 0.52.
You never name it yourself. Your assistant picks the right tool: procurement_efsa_openfoodtox_qualitaetsbewertung__evaluate_study_quality
What you give it
| What to give | Kind of value | Needed? | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| substance_name | string | yes | Chemical substance name (e.g. Bisphenol A, Carbendazim, Glyphosate) |
| study_count | number | yes | Total number of supporting studies in line of evidence |
| high_quality_study_count | number | optional | Number of high quality studies meeting Klimisch 1/2 or SciRAP standards |
| qsar_reliability_score | number | optional | Optional QSAR reliability score from TEST or VEGA tools |
What you get back
| What comes back | Kind of value | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| scheer_quality_grade | string | SCHEER 2026 Quality Grade (Grade A, B, C or Cannot judge) |
| scheer_consistency_grade | string | SCHEER 2026 Consistency Grade (Grade I, II, III or Cannot judge) |
| scheer_overall_strength | string | Integrated Weight of Evidence strength rating |
| qsar_acceptance_status | string | EFSA QSAR prediction acceptance status |
| qualichem_confidence_level | string | Overall Qualichem study confidence level |
| disclaimer | string | factual retrieval disclaimer |
Sources
- SCHEER Memorandum on Weight of Evidence approach for Risk Assessment UPDATE 2026
- EFSA OpenFoodTox 3.0 Chemical Hazards Database (Zenodo DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19388272)
- Qualichem In Vivo Framework for Study Quality Assessment (PLOS One)
- EFSA Guidance on Effect Models for Predictive QSAR Acceptance
Who wrote this
Every capability is written by one named publisher. You see who stands behind an answer, and you can take the conversation further with them directly.
fmcg.network Core Team
verifiedPlatform capabilities and reference implementations
Network team
What the assistant can offer next
Related reading
How uncertainty is handled
This check reports a confidence score with every answer. Below 80 out of 100 nothing is guessed: the uncertain items go to a review queue and the answer comes back marked "needs review".
Read how quality levels work